• Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well, if you have one you should read it some time. But since most english versions are awful at best, and deliberately deceptive at worst, I recommend the one I linked.

    • Manmoth@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ad hominem

      Unjustified claim

      nth challenge to theological position ignored in favor of the above-mentioned

      • Veraxus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You asked where my plain recitation of scripture comes from, and I answered you. If you don’t like that scripture doesn’t support your wickedness, that’s between you and God, not me. That you can only attack me rather than the scripture itself is telling. 😞

        • Manmoth@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Ignores the term exegesis which exists because objectivity is impossible when reading historical texts

          Doubles down on anachronistic interpretation that projects modern poltical and social climate onto 2000 year old scriptures which by own admission require anthropological awareness

          Another ad hominem for good measure

          Won’t touch argument about origin of the scriptural canon with a ten foot pole