Because you’re obviously not interesting in actually learning anything, you just want to argue.

A) citing scholarly consensus is not an argument ad populum. So you’re not even correct in asserting a logical fallacy.

B) that link has the sources dipshit. Read them if you want. Or stick your fingers in your ears and keep screaming like a child. Doesn’t make a difference to me. I don’t give a shit about you.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

Virtually every historian of the time period, religious and secular, agree that Jesus the man did exist.