• Veraxus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well, if you have one you should read it some time. But since most english versions are awful at best, and deliberately deceptive at worst, I recommend the one I linked.

        • Manmoth@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ad hominem

          Unjustified claim

          nth challenge to theological position ignored in favor of the above-mentioned

          • Veraxus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            You asked where my plain recitation of scripture comes from, and I answered you. If you don’t like that scripture doesn’t support your wickedness, that’s between you and God, not me. That you can only attack me rather than the scripture itself is telling. 😞

            • Manmoth@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Ignores the term exegesis which exists because objectivity is impossible when reading historical texts

              Doubles down on anachronistic interpretation that projects modern poltical and social climate onto 2000 year old scriptures which by own admission require anthropological awareness

              Another ad hominem for good measure

              Won’t touch argument about origin of the scriptural canon with a ten foot pole