• Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Where is this in scripture?

    If you don’t know who the scribes and Pharisees are, or who their analogues are today… well, like I said before, that explains everything… including your twisted, hateful, anti-Christ beliefs. There’s nothing left to be said here. The scripture is as it has always been… written black-and-white in Koine and Hebrew and Aramaic. It’s still there, unchanged. Ready to be read, as it always has and always will be. Jesus left behind the teaching… not a political institution that can just add whatever it wants whenever it wants to suit it’s purposes.

    • Manmoth@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Fair enough. Can you send me a link to whatever source you are using for this theology? (assuming you didnt just make it up)

          • Veraxus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well, if you have one you should read it some time. But since most english versions are awful at best, and deliberately deceptive at worst, I recommend the one I linked.

            • Manmoth@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Ad hominem

              Unjustified claim

              nth challenge to theological position ignored in favor of the above-mentioned

              • Veraxus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                You asked where my plain recitation of scripture comes from, and I answered you. If you don’t like that scripture doesn’t support your wickedness, that’s between you and God, not me. That you can only attack me rather than the scripture itself is telling. 😞

                • Manmoth@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Ignores the term exegesis which exists because objectivity is impossible when reading historical texts

                  Doubles down on anachronistic interpretation that projects modern poltical and social climate onto 2000 year old scriptures which by own admission require anthropological awareness

                  Another ad hominem for good measure

                  Won’t touch argument about origin of the scriptural canon with a ten foot pole